[CeFurkan]

You beat player A from ELO league match making

That player A can revenge you but you can not revenge him again after he beaten you

how is that sound?

Or should we never implement revenge system for ELO?

[kunwarkharbanda]

No rematch isnt good

Player will wait till good player beat him and gain points by.doing a rematch
Thete will be delibretate  attempts by less pts player that strong player faces him

[Daeva13]

You beat player A from ELO league match making

That player A can revenge you but you can not revenge him again after he beaten you

how is that sound?

Or should we never implement revenge system for ELO?

I think a rematch is fair but just one

[SeaQueen]

idk, i like doing the revenge but it seems a little unfair, they beat me and get 2+ points while i go back and beat them again and get 29+ points, he tries again and i still his points again, so he gets maybe 4+ points and i get 58+ points in 2 rounds, i think the points given could be better if not anything else, but i think a player only getting 1 revenge sounds fair

[Blau]

Well, one way would be for revenge to bypass protection. 
But that's only one minor part.
Fair would be, if they'd just gain the points they loose.
So i beat someone for 16pts, he would gain 2 by beating me.
Instead
I beat someone for 16pts, they gain the 16pts back, regardless how much lower I'm than those.
But only via revenge, regular should still reward normal amount

[CeFurkan]

Well, one way would be for revenge to bypass protection. 
But that's only one minor part.
Fair would be, if they'd just gain the points they loose.
So i beat someone for 16pts, he would gain 2 by beating me.
Instead
I beat someone for 16pts, they gain the 16pts back, regardless how much lower I'm than those.
But only via revenge, regular should still reward normal amount

so you say fair one is you get what you lose?

also do you support only 1 time revenge or infinite revenge?

[Blau]

Well, one way would be for revenge to bypass protection. 
But that's only one minor part.
Fair would be, if they'd just gain the points they loose.
So i beat someone for 16pts, he would gain 2 by beating me.
Instead
I beat someone for 16pts, they gain the 16pts back, regardless how much lower I'm than those.
But only via revenge, regular should still reward normal amount

so you say fair one is you get what you lose?

also do you support only 1 time revenge or infinite revenge?

Well, the abusive factor i see as the main problem, is that low tier elo players can destroy alot of points from high tiers, while high tiers can only gain ever so few.
I'd say it depends. 
If it bypasses protection,  it should only be once a day, if it doesn't, maybe Infinite.
Ultimately I'd say once a das is reasonable,  I'm just somewhat against having to spam elo to keep a rank / grow in rank.
But maybe the majority enjoys that, so don't just consider my opinion. 
And then again, all of that might change once AI is brilliant. 

But yes, I think revenge should cancel out the loss of points. 

[SeaQueen]

Well, one way would be for revenge to bypass protection. 
But that's only one minor part.
Fair would be, if they'd just gain the points they loose.
So i beat someone for 16pts, he would gain 2 by beating me.
Instead
I beat someone for 16pts, they gain the 16pts back, regardless how much lower I'm than those.
But only via revenge, regular should still reward normal amount

so you say fair one is you get what you lose?

also do you support only 1 time revenge or infinite revenge?

Well, the abusive factor i see as the main problem, is that low tier elo players can destroy alot of points from high tiers, while high tiers can only gain ever so few.
I'd say it depends. 
If it bypasses protection,  it should only be once a day, if it doesn't, maybe Infinite.
Ultimately I'd say once a das is reasonable,  I'm just somewhat against having to spam elo to keep a rank / grow in rank.
But maybe the majority enjoys that, so don't just consider my opinion. 
And then again, all of that might change once AI is brilliant. 

But yes, I think revenge should cancel out the loss of points. 

I agree, cuz as i stated before, i get 29+ points by beating someone i could never beat in pvp, and they battle me and only get 2 points,

[CeFurkan]

Well, one way would be for revenge to bypass protection. 
But that's only one minor part.
Fair would be, if they'd just gain the points they loose.
So i beat someone for 16pts, he would gain 2 by beating me.
Instead
I beat someone for 16pts, they gain the 16pts back, regardless how much lower I'm than those.
But only via revenge, regular should still reward normal amount

so you say fair one is you get what you lose?

also do you support only 1 time revenge or infinite revenge?

Well, the abusive factor i see as the main problem, is that low tier elo players can destroy alot of points from high tiers, while high tiers can only gain ever so few.
I'd say it depends. 
If it bypasses protection,  it should only be once a day, if it doesn't, maybe Infinite.
Ultimately I'd say once a das is reasonable,  I'm just somewhat against having to spam elo to keep a rank / grow in rank.
But maybe the majority enjoys that, so don't just consider my opinion. 
And then again, all of that might change once AI is brilliant. 

But yes, I think revenge should cancel out the loss of points. 

ok so this system

you can get only what you have lost
it bypass protection but only 1 time.
it will be like player A beats you and now you have revenge option against player A. Then you beat player A in revenge match but player A will not get a revenge option. So from only ELO matchings you will get revenge option. 

How is this sound? open to abuse etc?

[THE HAWK]

It would be good if revenge only compensates for points lost. and it can be done only once

[kane001]

You beat player A from ELO league match making

That player A can revenge you but you can not revenge him again after he beaten you

how is that sound?

Or should we never implement revenge system for ELO?

i am rank 1 in elo  so i think no revenge sytem should be implemented ...

[deadman]

You beat player A from ELO league match making

That player A can revenge you but you can not revenge him again after he beaten you

how is that sound?

Or should we never implement revenge system for ELO?

revenge system is better when both elo league players are doing online elo league battle.

[abbaskhan8008]

Judit Castillo pickleball player, fondly called “You-dit,” was born on November 6, 1998, in Teruel, Spain. She takes pride in her identity as a “Chinchirina,” a name for people from Mosqueruela, Teruel. Judit is the youngest among her three siblings, having brothers named Ismael and Marta.

[Mirtinvest]

Для оплаты медицинских расходов искал быстрый займ без отказа. Всё оформил за несколько минут, деньги сразу поступили на карту — очень удобно!

[amlasmith]

mplementing a revenge system in ELO matches could add an interesting dynamic, but it also raises questions about fairness and gameplay balance. If Player A can only seek revenge without reciprocation, it might create frustration. The system should consider whether it enhances the competitive spirit or leads to negativity. Instead, players could focus on improving their skills rather than seeking revenge.

For a refreshing experience, consider exploring the diverse Morocco desert tours available at https://atlastriptour.com/morocco-desert-tours.

[LindaCed]

Gifts

Welcome to this wonderful shop.

We offer a widest range of products, from original accessories and designer items to elegant corporate gifts that are suitable for any celebration.


[url=]шоколадные конфеты на заказ с логотипом[/url]

[lossauzasalle]

Thank you so much for your valuable response! I appreciate the thoroughness and clarity of your response. I want to express my gratitude for your quick and informative response. Your knowledge on the subject is impressive!