Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In-house vs remote developers: what to choose?
#1
A question has arisen that perhaps we could discuss together. I'm thinking of comparing in-house team and remote Solidity developers. What are the pros and cons of each approach? Of course, working in an office gives you more control, but remote developers have their own appeal. For example, you can search for talent all over the world. On the other hand, there can be difficulties in coordination and communication when working remotely. What are your thoughts on this issue?
#2
Hi! If you consider an in-house team, there are obvious advantages: close collaboration, quick exchange of ideas and quality control. However, it is expensive and takes time to train. Remote developers, on the other hand, provide access to the global talent market, which allows you to find specialists with the right skills and, importantly, it's more cost-effective. Platforms like https://qit.software/hire-solidity-developers/ allow you to hire experienced professionals to develop smart contracts. The disadvantage of remote developers is difficulty in coordination and quality control, especially when working in different time zones. It is important to find a balance: an in-house team is suitable for close collaboration, while remote developers are suitable for flexibility and cost reduction.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)

Users browsed this thread: gymitat , lossauzasalle , vicecrufoli