[katana]

I’ve been trying out a few different AI nudification tools recently, and I’m amazed by how well they predict body shapes from photos. Some are more accurate than others, but it seems like the quality of the input image plays a huge role. I tested it with a few different poses, and the results were better when the body was fully visible and well-lit. Has anyone else used these tools and noticed a big difference between photos with good lighting vs. poor lighting?

[binik]

I’ve definitely seen a difference based on lighting. The AI seems to rely a lot on shadows and body outlines, so photos with clear, even lighting give the best results. I’ve used a tool through a https://undress-ai.io/ and it works great with photos that have a lot of visible detail and contrast. The more you can make the body stand out, the better the AI works, but it’s still not perfect with more complex poses.

[jimlo]

That’s true, lighting and body visibility make a huge difference. I also found that the AI works best with simpler poses. The more natural the body position, the more accurate the tool is at predicting body shape. It’s interesting to see how much the technology has improved over the years, but it still has a long way to go before it’s perfect.

[solutionsh724]

sadsffs

[davidcosta]

Amazing

[davidcosta]

Amazing Content Bro

[davidcosta]

I appreciate the depth of strategy shared here. Balancing types is key, much like structuring chapters in a book. An ebook publisher often sees how small details create a bigger impact, similar to EV training.